Massachusetts Sensible Marijuana Policy Initiative - Revision history

Adm1n at 04:51, 8 March 2015

2015-03-08T04:51:54Z

Adm1n: /* Individuals */

2015-03-08T04:51:13Z

‎Individuals

Adm1n: /* Newspaper Editorial endorsements */

2015-03-08T04:50:53Z

‎Newspaper Editorial endorsements

Adm1n: /* Supporters */

2015-03-08T04:49:55Z

‎Supporters

Show changes

Adm1n: /* Opposition */

2015-03-08T04:43:51Z

‎Opposition

Adm1n: /* Controversies */

2015-03-08T04:43:27Z

‎Controversies

Adm1n: /* See also */

2015-03-08T04:42:44Z

‎See also

Adm1n at 04:42, 8 March 2015

2015-03-08T04:42:10Z

Adm1n: Created page with "The Sensible Marijuana Policy Initiative, also known as Massachusetts Ballot Question 2, was an initiated state statute that replaced prior criminal penalties with new civil p..."

2015-01-31T15:49:17Z

Created page with "The Sensible Marijuana Policy Initiative, also known as Massachusetts Ballot Question 2, was an initiated state statute that replaced prior criminal penalties with new civil p..."

New page

The Sensible Marijuana Policy Initiative, also known as Massachusetts Ballot Question 2, was an initiated state statute that replaced prior criminal penalties with new civil penalties on adults possessing an ounce or less of marijuana. The initiative appeared on the November 4, 2008, ballot in Massachusetts.

The measure was passed on Nov 4. and became public law on January 2, 2009

Question 2:

Replaced criminal penalties with a US$100 fine of which the proceeds go to the city where the offense takes place.

Eliminated the collection of Criminal Offender Record Information (CORI) reports for minor marijuana related infractions.

Maintained then-current penalties for selling, growing, and trafficking marijuana, as well as the prohibition against driving under the influence of [[marijuana]].

The law requires additional penalties for minors such as Parental notification, compulsory drug awareness program, and 10 hours community service that was not required under prior law. It also requires a larger US$1,000 fine and possible delinquency proceedings for those under 17 if they do not complete the requirements of the law.

The law represents a break with prior law in Massachusetts, where people charged with marijuana possession faced criminal penalties of up to six months in jail and a US$500 fine, as well as a CORI report being filed.

On Tuesday, September 10, 2008, a city councillor in Worcester called for a vote on a measure to express the opposition by the city of Worcester to the initiative. The city council rejected and voted down the measure by a 10-1 vote, with the only vote for the measure coming from the councillor that requested the vote.

== Supporters ==

The [[Committee for Sensible Marijuana Policy]] is the leading proponent of the initiative. Whitney Taylor serves as the committee's treasurer and chairwoman.

'''Organizations'''

National Association of Social Workers—Massachusetts Chapter

Greater Boston Civil Rights Coalition

Criminal Justice Policy Coalition

American Civil Liberties Union — National

Law Enforcement Against Prohibition

American Civil Liberties Union — Massachusetts chapter

National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws

Massachusetts Cannabis Reform Coalition, Inc. (aka "MassCann")

Univ. of Massachusetts, Amherst Cannabis Reform Coalition (not part of prev. listed group, "MassCann")

Union of Minority Neighborhoods

The Boston Worker’s Alliance

[[Marijuana Policy Project]]

Brookline Police Department

'''Individuals'''

Paul T. Breeden - President/CEO Boston Live Magazine/Boston Live Charity Fund Inc.

Ronald Ansin, ACLU, philanthropist

Charles H. Baron, Esq., Boston College School of Law

Jack Cole, Law Enforcement Against Prohibition

Michael D. Cutler, Esq.

Richard Elliott Doblin, PhD, MAPS

Sergeant Howard Donohue, a 33-year veteran of the Boston Police Department

Lester Grinspoon, M.D., associate professor emeritus of psychiatry at Harvard Medical School

John H. Halpern, M.D., assistant professor of psychiatry at Harvard Medical School

Massachusetts state Sen. Patricia Jehlen (D-Second Middlesex), chair of the Joint Committee on Elder Affairs and Vice-Chair of the Joint Committee on State

Administration and Regulatory Oversight

Wendy Kaminer, Esq., ACLU, author, journalist

Woody Kaplan, ACLU, philanthropist

Thomas R. Kiley, Esq., Cosgrove, Eisenberg & Kiley

Karen Klein, Brandeis University, Unitarian Universalists for Drug Policy Reform

Lanny Kutakoff, Partakers, Inc.

Dr. Robert Meenan, dean of the Boston University School of Public Health

Lieutenant Thomas Nolan, a 30-year veteran of the Boston Police Department who now teaches criminology at Boston University

Massachusetts state Rep. Frank Smizik (D-Fifteenth Norfolk), chair of the Joint Committee on Environment, Natural Resources and Agriculture

Carl Valvo, Esq., Cosgrove, Eisenberg & Kiley

Ernest “Tony” Windsor, Esq., Massachusetts Law Reform Institute

George Soros - Hedge Fund Manager

Massachusetts State Rep. Jim O’Day (D-fourteenth Worcester)

'''Religious Leaders'''

Rev. Jean Alexander, Auburndale

Rabbi Alan Alpert, Leominster

Rev. Molly Baskette, Somerville

Father Richard Beaulieu, Winchester

Rev. Jim Bronwell, Barre

Rev. Suzanne Brunnquell, Pittsfield

Rev. Sarah Buteux, Amherst

Rev. Dr. Jan Carlsson-Bull, Cohasset

Rev. Thomas Carlton, Ludlow

Rev. Stephen Cook

Father Richard Crowley, Middleboro

Rev. C. Edward Deyton, Andover

Father Thomas Dilorenzo, Winthrop

Rev. Jonathan Drury, Andover

Rev. Leigh Dry, Hopkinton

Rev. Kathrene Duhon, Great Barrington

Rev. Lisa Durkee Abbott, West Brookfield

Rev. Dr. Dorothy May Emerson, Billerica

Rev. Marc Fredette, Waltham

Rev. Tamarack Garlow, Ashley Falls

Rev. John Gibbons, Bedford

Rev. Jamie Green, West Groton

Rev. Edward Hardy, Abington

Rev. William Hobbs, Athol

Rev. Dr. Anne Ierardi, Yarmouthport

Ms. Marion Jansen, Great Barrington

Rev. David Johnson, Plymouth

Rev. Bill Leggett, Milford

Father John Lis, Williamsburg

Rev. Jeffrey Long-Middleton, Acton

Rev. Ian Lynch, Brimfield

Rev. Art McDonald, Essex

Rabbi Richard Messing, North Easton

Rev. Stephen Philbrick, Cummington

Rev. Susie Phoenix, Lee

Rev. Katherine Reis, Rockport

Rev. Edmund Robinson, Chatham

Rev. Ken Sawyer, Wayland

Rev. Dr. Victor Scalise, Somerville

Rev. Warren Scamman, Windsor

Rev. Richard Schlak, Foxboro

Rev. Stephen Shick, Hudson

Rev. Judith Smith-Valley, Brewster

Rev. Paul Sprecher, Hingham

Rev. C. William Steelman, Nantucket

Rev. Rachel Tedesco, Taunton

Rev. Jonathan Tetherly, Chicopee

Rev. Patricia Tummino, Middleboro

Rabbi Andrew Vogel, Brookline

Rev. Vicki Woods, Worcester

Rev. Dr. Judith Wright, Boylston

'''Newspaper Editorial endorsements'''

The Daily Free Press

The Bay state Banner

The Harvard Crimson

The Newton TAB

The Milford Daily News

The Springfield Republican

The Metrowest Daily News

The Daily News Tribune

The Brookline TAB

The Fall River Herald News

The Danvers Herald

MIT Tech

'''Polls'''

A Suffolk University / WHDH Channel 7 poll has shown that 72 percent of Greater Boston residents are in favor of replacing criminal penalties with civil fines for
carrying an ounce or less of marijuana. "The public may be signaling that pursuing small-time marijuana users is a waste of taxpayer resources," said David Paleologos, director of the Political Research Bureau at Suffolk University. "This issue suggests there is a libertarian streak in the thinking of the Massachusetts voter." The poll was conducted with 400 residents between July 31 and August 3, 2008.

A FastTrack poll by WBZ TV /Survey USA on September 17 showed that 69% of all Massachusetts voters would favor either decriminalization or legalization. It was broken down to 30% want it remain a crime, 31% want it changed to a civil fine and 38% would like it to be legalized completely. The poll had a margin of error of 4.5%.

'''Arguments in favor'''

Supporting arguments advanced by the proponents include:

It would save Massachusetts US$130 million per year, according to a 2002 report by Harvard economist Jeffrey Miron.

Instances of minor marijuana possession would no longer affect if people can obtain jobs, housing, and student loans.

Currently there are about 2.8 million CORI records on file for a population of 6 million.

Small convictions have been shown to have little or no impact on drug use.

'''History'''

The National Commission on Marijuana and Drug Abuse (also known as the Shafer Commission) was created by Public Law 91-513 in 1972 to study marijuana abuse in the United States. It published its findings in a report called Marihuana: A Signal of Misunderstanding and recommended that the president should decriminalize possession of marijuana in amounts that constituted "simple possession".

So far 30 non-binding public policy questions calling for civil fines for possession of marijuana rather than criminal penalties have passed in legislative districts throughout Massachusetts since 2000. These questions were passed with an average of 62% of the vote in favor. No Public policy question related to replacing criminal penalties with civil fines has ever failed in the state of Massachusetts.

The Joint Mental Health and Substance Abuse Committee of the Massachusetts General Court voted 6-1 in favor of a bill that would have made possession of less than an ounce of marijuana punishable by a civil fine.

'''Funding'''

Billionaire George Soros made an initial contribution of $400,000. The committee has also received $750,000 cash as well as about $320,000 in donated time and services from the Marijuana Policy Project, an organization created to reform marijuana laws in the United States. According to campaign finance reports, as of November 1, 2008, the committee has raised approximately $1,250,000 to help pass the measure with $40,060.90 remaining.

== Opposition ==

The Coalition for Safe Streets, a committee organized to oppose Question 2, launched a statewide campaign Sept. 5 to defeat the measure. Jonathan W. Blodgett, the Essex County District Attorney serves as the Coalition's treasurer and chairman.

Michael O'Keefe, the president of the Massachusetts District Attorneys Association, is opposed to the initiative. He believes that the measure will lead to an increase in minors using the drug by sending the wrong message to them.

The O'Keefe Committee is one of ten committees representing district attorneys in Massachusetts that have contributed to the Coalition.

William Breault, chairman of the Main South Alliance for Public Safety in Worcester, also plans to oppose this initiative.

'''Funding'''

According to Campaign Finance reports, as of November 1, 2008, the ten committees representing district attorneys in Massachusetts have contributed approximately $2,275 each to the Coalition along with a donation of $2,500 from the Worcester County Deputy Sheriffs Association as well as a few other donors for a total of approx $60,000, after expenditures they have $0 to fight the initiative and $2,601.92 in outstanding liabilities.

== Controversies ==

On September 17, 2008, the Committee for Sensible Marijuana Policy filed complaints with the Office of Campaign and Political Finance and the Attorney General's office against the Massachusetts District Attorney Association, the 11 state district attorneys and O'Neill and Associates, a Boston public relations firm. Violations of the campaign finance law could result in up to 1 year in jail and a $1,000 fine.

Also, Middlesex District Attorney Gerry Leone has stated that in the event the majority of voters in the State of Massachusetts were to pass the initiative, he will attempt to override the vote and defeat it in an appellate process.

'''Alleged Complaints'''

Under Massachusetts law, it is illegal to solicit, receive, or spend funds to support or oppose a ballot initiative without first forming a political committee. CSMP alleges that the district attorneys solicited, received, and spent donations before they were legally allowed to, attempting to conceal their campaign activity for as long as they could.

CSMP further alleges that the district attorneys used public funds to post and house a statement urging voters to reject the decriminalization initiative on its Web site, a violation of Massachusetts election law, which prohibits public officials from using public resources to advocate for or against a ballot initiative. The statement on the state run Massachusetts District Attorneys Association website says that if the question is approved, "any person may carry and use marijuana at any time," which is untrue.

== Petition drive to qualify ==

The support group collected over 105,000 signatures, far exceeding the requirement of 66,593 valid signatures. Since Massachusetts is an indirect initiative state, this meant that the Massachusetts State Legislature had to take up the proposed measure. Since the legislature declined to act on it by early May, the supporter then had until June 18, 2008, to collect another 11,099 signatures to ensure that the initiative is placed on the November 2008 statewide ballot, a goal at which they succeeded.

== Enactment ==

As per Massachusetts law, the initiative became public law on January 2, 2009, 30 days from the date it was presented to the Governor's Council and certified.

== See also ==

[[Personal Use of Marijuana by Responsible Adults Act of 2008]]

@@ Line 235: / Line 235: @@
 *MIT Tech
-== Polls ==
+=== Polls ===
 A Suffolk University / WHDH Channel 7 poll has shown that 72 percent of Greater Boston residents are in favor of replacing criminal penalties with civil fines for
@@ Line 243: / Line 243: @@
 A FastTrack poll by WBZ TV /Survey USA on September 17 showed that 69% of all Massachusetts voters would favor either decriminalization or legalization. It was broken down to 30% want it remain a crime, 31% want it changed to a civil fine and 38% would like it to be legalized completely. The poll had a margin of error of 4.5%.
-== Arguments in favor ==
+=== Arguments in favor ===
 Supporting arguments advanced by the proponents include:
@@ Line 266: / Line 266: @@
 The Joint Mental Health and Substance Abuse Committee of the Massachusetts General Court voted 6-1 in favor of a bill that would have made possession of less than an ounce of marijuana punishable by a civil fine.
-== Funding ==
+=== Funding ===
 Billionaire George Soros made an initial contribution of $400,000. The committee has also received $750,000 cash as well as about $320,000 in donated time and services from the Marijuana Policy Project, an organization created to reform marijuana laws in the United States. According to campaign finance reports, as of November 1, 2008, the committee has raised approximately $1,250,000 to help pass the measure with $40,060.90 remaining.

@@ Line 55: / Line 55: @@
 *Brookline Police Department
-== Individuals ==
+=== Individuals ===
 *Paul T. Breeden - President/CEO Boston Live Magazine/Boston Live Charity Fund Inc.

@@ Line 211: / Line 211: @@
 === Newspaper Editorial endorsements ===
-The Daily Free Press
+*The Bay state Banner
-The Bay state Banner
+*The Harvard Crimson
-The Harvard Crimson
+*The Newton TAB
-The Newton TAB
+*The Milford Daily News
-The Milford Daily News
+*The Springfield Republican
-The Springfield Republican
+*The Metrowest Daily News
-The Metrowest Daily News
+*The Daily News Tribune
-The Daily News Tribune
+*The Brookline TAB
-The Brookline TAB
+*The Fall River Herald News
-The Fall River Herald News
+*The Danvers Herald
-The Danvers Herald
+*MIT Tech
-−
-MIT Tec
 == Polls ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:43, 8 March 2015
Line 304:		Line 304:


−	~~'''~~Alleged Complaints~~'''~~	+	=== Alleged Complaints ===

−	Under Massachusetts law, it is illegal to solicit, receive, or spend funds to support or oppose a ballot initiative without first forming a political committee. CSMP alleges that the district attorneys solicited, received, and spent donations before they were legally allowed to, attempting to conceal their campaign activity for as long as they could.

		+	*Under Massachusetts law, it is illegal to solicit, receive, or spend funds to support or oppose a ballot initiative without first forming a political committee. CSMP alleges that the district attorneys solicited, received, and spent donations before they were legally allowed to, attempting to conceal their campaign activity for as long as they could.

−	CSMP further alleges that the district attorneys used public funds to post and house a statement urging voters to reject the decriminalization initiative on its Web site, a violation of Massachusetts election law, which prohibits public officials from using public resources to advocate for or against a ballot initiative. The statement on the state run Massachusetts District Attorneys Association website says that if the question is approved, "any person may carry and use marijuana at any time," which is untrue.

		+	*CSMP further alleges that the district attorneys used public funds to post and house a statement urging voters to reject the decriminalization initiative on its Web site, a violation of Massachusetts election law, which prohibits public officials from using public resources to advocate for or against a ballot initiative. The statement on the state run Massachusetts District Attorneys Association website says that if the question is approved, "any person may carry and use marijuana at any time," which is untrue.

	== Petition drive to qualify ==		== Petition drive to qualify ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:42, 8 March 2015
Line 324:		Line 324:
	== See also ==		== See also ==

−	[[Personal Use of Marijuana by Responsible Adults Act of 2008]]	+	*[[Personal Use of Marijuana by Responsible Adults Act of 2008]]

@@ Line 290: / Line 290: @@
 William Breault, chairman of the Main South Alliance for Public Safety in Worcester, also plans to oppose this initiative.
+=== Funding ===
-'''Funding'''
 According to Campaign Finance reports, as of November 1, 2008, the ten committees representing district attorneys in Massachusetts have contributed approximately $2,275 each to the Coalition along with a donation of $2,500 from the Worcester County Deputy Sheriffs Association as well as a few other donors for a total of approx $60,000, after expenditures they have $0 to fight the initiative and $2,601.92 in outstanding liabilities.
 == Controversies ==

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
-Replaced criminal penalties with a US$100 fine of which the proceeds go to the city where the offense takes place.
+*Replaced criminal penalties with a US$100 fine of which the proceeds go to the city where the offense takes place.
-Eliminated the collection of Criminal Offender Record Information (CORI) reports for minor marijuana related infractions.
+*Eliminated the collection of Criminal Offender Record Information (CORI) reports for minor marijuana related infractions.
-Maintained then-current penalties for selling, growing, and trafficking marijuana, as well as the prohibition against driving under the influence of [[marijuana]].
+*Maintained then-current penalties for selling, growing, and trafficking [[marijuana]], as well as the prohibition against driving under the influence of [[marijuana]].
 The law represents a break with prior law in Massachusetts, where people charged with marijuana possession faced criminal penalties of up to six months in jail and a US$500 fine, as well as a CORI report being filed.